🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Simultaneously, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and legacy from the records is under way. One of the political figure's first executive orders focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month illustrates how insufficiently it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a educator at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just eliminate things like Black History Month completely, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not shy away from politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is mere awareness of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who celebrate it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that face all if opposition to discrimination is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.