🔗 Share this article

Following a notable regulatory appeal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a earlier ruling that blocked Australian-based users from accessing recorded content of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's social media platform, arguing against an order sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Original Classification Ruling

After the death of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in last year, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. The board first determined the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the regulator to instruct social media companies to geo-block the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been deemed "refused classification".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not overly graphic, gratuitous, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that generated extensive public discourse". The platform even compared the footage and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the review board concluded that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a longer or clearer version with different editing might have met that threshold. As a result, the panel changed the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the board held a contrary view, arguing the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of amusement and/or benefit (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was invalid, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, X expressed approval of the ruling.

"We challenged this decision to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to protecting these principles."

A spokesperson for the safety regulator also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "have obligations to prevent R18+ material being displayed to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

Separately, the eSafety commissioner has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. The regulator stated that while the content were upsetting, they had not met the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been advised to apply warning labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on this material in accordance with their own content policies.